Skip to content
Submit Manuscript|Subscribe
J

Peer Review Process

JOTS uses a double-anonymous peer review model.

  1. 1

    Desk screening

    Editors conduct an initial screening for scope fit, methodological rigor, and ethical compliance before peer review.

  2. 2

    External review

    Each submission is reviewed by two independent reviewers.

  3. 3

    Decision

    Editors issue a decision and outline revision guidance when applicable.

  4. 4

    Appeals

    Authors may appeal decisions within 30 days with a clear, evidence-based rationale reviewed by a senior editor.

Decision outcomes

  • Accept.
  • Minor Revision.
  • Major Revision.
  • Reject.

Confidentiality and ethics

  • Manuscripts and review content are confidential and may not be shared externally.
  • Reviewers must disclose conflicts of interest before accepting assignments.
  • Editors reassign reviews when conflicts or ethical concerns are identified.